Acaba de salir el Informe titulado “Who gets a press pass?: Media Credentialing Practices in the United States” preparado por el Digital Media Law Project del Berkman Center for Internet & Society y por el Journalist’s Resource Project. Este informe es el primero en su clase detallando prácticas en diferentes jurisdicciones de Estados Unidos (incluyendo Puerto Rico) relacionadas con la concesión de credenciales de prensa a diversos tipos de gestores de noticia. Reitero además que en PR hemos recorrido bastante camino, al menos en los tribunales (queda por verse si en la práctica), pues hace unos años ganamos un caso en la Clínica de la UPR de Nuevas Tecnologías, Propiedad Intelectual y Sociedad sobre este asunto. Informé del caso aquí. Encuentran el informe en este enlace. Según el resumen ejecutivo del Informe:
The journalism market in the United States is more diverse than ever before, with a wide array of independent newsgatherers complementing the work of institutional news organizations. But regardless of where journalists practice, it is essential to their mission that they have access to information about the activities of government and private organizations. In many cases, laws that grant the public rights of access to government (such as open meetings laws, freedom of information acts, and constitutional rights of access to judicial proceedings) also guarantee that members of the media can obtain information they need.
But when journalists need access to government or private spaces beyond what is allowed to the public at large, they must obtain special permission. This frequently takes the form of a media credential, an official document or statement from an organization that the journalist is permitted to be somewhere or engage in particular activity, regardless of rules applicable to the rest of the public. The issuance of credentials is, however, far less uniformly regulated than other interactions between press and government. Diverse standards imposed by federal, state, local, and private organizations have led to confusion over who should receive media credentials in different contexts, and raised questions about the definitions of journalism used by these organizations.
This study, the first of its kind to perform a quantitative examination of media credentialing in the United States, surveys the experience of journalists throughout the country in their efforts to obtain media credentials from different types of credentialing organizations from 2008 to 2013. The survey results show that one out of every five respondents who applied for a credential was denied by a credentialing organization at least once. Moreover, certain categories of applicants are more likely to be denied than others: freelance journalists were significantly less likely to receive media credentials than employed journalists; photographers were more likely to be denied than non-photographers; and respondents who identified themselves as activists were more likely to be denied than those who did not.